Ireceived it from two sides: the verdicts in the affair of Fränke Schneider versus François Bausch were sent to the chief editor of the major media houses, the verdict of second instance in late June / early July. Therefore, no one can say that the affair was “overlooked in danger”. The question arises: what is happening in our media landscape? Didn’t anyone – except Radio Luxembourg – find it necessary to cross that line with just a few lines on the paper? Is it really so uninteresting that a former MP – today Minister of Justice – has been found guilty? Or was it rather because a “SREL man” had won that process? That we gravissime!
T
he hope is that I remember thinking that it was not about putting things under the rug. The argument: “one did not want to manipulate any election by October 14 before any other elections”, I can accept in part; in which case, you might have had a good time afterwards to write the verdicts! This is why I am advocating for the asparagus state! The asparagus shoots only once a year, but then comes to daylight. A Chicon shines the light and, consequently, becomes more battered. Now we have March … and as always: when one wants to go into a story, a property dynamic arises and there are a number of peculiar details, just like, from the ground up …. affair à purre! Have a nice weekend!
