Gaston Vogel: once again he writes!

0
44
Image parBruno Glätsch de Pixabay

                                                                               

Mayor Gaston Vogel received police details from his file yesterday. There were also reactions on Facebook, which in turn led the lawyer to write another letter to the police and to Minister Bausch.

 

DIRECTORATE OF THE GRAND DUCAL POLICE

a.m. from the Director

L – 2957 LUXEMBOURG

email : contact@police.public.lu

 

 

 

Luxembourg, August 14, 2019

 

Relates to: Confirmation of the locker bis

 

 

Mister Director,

I come back to your letter dated 07.08.2019.

Please specify the precise date of the traffic offenses.

Finally, what does the sentence mean: “You have been the subject of a registration for convocation ??? ”

What is that ?

Why do you keep 38 offenses in your file, all related to traffic and not prosecuted?

All the butterflies you let flutter have been settled for a long time.

Why do you keep track of these mini-tiny incidents, unless you consider them to endanger the security of the country?

Read what former Registrar Reiland writes on Facebook:

 

Such a collection of ATs has always been provided as a means to obtain an “appreciation” for a person.

The appreciation will also be reported to the public on an occasional basis in my new procedural verb.

Where a list of old protocols is then submitted to the probationary, they shall not comply with the traffic rules with persistence and consistency.

If the substitute who was to sign the protocol to send a new ordinance penalized had a bad day, then he cited the case in a session and filed a driver’s license.

I signed it myself, at the time of a commercial of the Place d’Armes who managed to shut the operation only at night, and had to wait for orders and orders to leave his bed in the morning. moving forward.

On the other hand, he owned a Ribambelle of more than 40 ATs and received the driving license, although he always paid a fair price.

With me VOGEL I would be curious to read what is in the secret acts of the SRE which we unfortunately never get to see.

There are also some nice “appreciations” that must be noticed.

 

Should we assume that you keep the memory of these little things to smear, when the time comes, an otherwise completely honorable citizen, who after 82 years of existence, has never had anything to blame himself for.

I want an answer to this nagging question and I will not give up.

Receive my feelings.

Gaston VOGEL

This letter is sent in copy to the Vice-President of the Chamber of Deputies, Mr Di Bartoloméo and to the Member of Parliament, Mr Laurent Mosar.

And then another letter to Minister François Bausch

 

Luxembourg, August 14, 2019

 

Relates to: Confirmation of the locker bis

 

Excellency,

It is clear now, notwithstanding all the objections and protests from your colleague Braz, who still seems to have understood nothing.

It is indeed in this file that the police archive everything, even the trashiest things, such as paid warnings, immediately set ruby on the nail.

Why keep anachronisms, things for a long time extinct – extinct as soon as the settlement is made?

Or do you think that irregular parking lots would threaten the foundations of the monarchical state?

Reiland, a former clerk, has a stinging answer – you will read it in the appendix.

I insist that you finally act – you have the energy capital to do it – proof of your posturing at the time when the Nordstrooss was still a battlefield for you.

I have fond memories of it in my records.

Receive my feelings.

Gaston VOGEL

 

And of course, a recent CSV parliamentary question came up:

Mr. Fernand Etgen

President of the Chamber of Deputies

Luxembourg, August 14, 2019

Mister President,

We hereby have the honor to inform you that, in accordance with article 84 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies, we would like to put an urgent question to the Minister of Internal Security and to the Minister of Justice concerning new revelations in the criminal record bis.

 

 

In a letter received today, a citizen reports claims by a former court clerk. Here is the content:

 

“Such a collection of ATs has always been provided as a means to obtain an” appreciation “for a person.

The appreciation will also be reported to the public on an occasional basis in my new procedural verb.

Where a list of old protocols is submitted to the probationary, they shall not comply with the traffic rules with persistence and consistency.

If the substitute who was to sign the protocol to send a new ordinance penalized had a bad day, then he cited the case in a session and filed a driver’s license.

I signed it myself, at the time of a commercial of the Place d’Armes who managed to shut the operation only at night, and had to wait for orders and orders to leave his bed in the morning. moving forward.

On the other hand, he owned a Ribambelle of more than 40 ATs and received the driving license, although he always paid a fair price.

With me VOGEL I would be curious to read what is in the secret acts of the SRE which we unfortunately never get to see.

There are also some nice “appreciations” that must be noticed. »

 

 

In view of all of the above, we would like to ask the following questions to the Ministers:

 

– Can the Ministers confirm these statements?

 

– If so, do the Ministers not consider that such acts are contrary to the principles and rules applicable in the field of data protection, to the principle of the presumption of innocence etc. ?

 

– Still in the affirmative, don’t these words call into question the statements made by the State Attorney General regarding the information contained in the criminal files?

 

– How do the Ministers intend to remedy this situation?

 

 

Please accept, Mr. President, the expression of our best regards.

 

 

 

 

 

Laurent Mosar

Député

Gilles Roth
Député

 

In addition, persons who reported to the maid who had taken one last look before a holiday, had added a further letter to the police:

                                                                                                     

DIRECTORATE OF THE GRAND DUCAL POLICE

a.m. from the Director

L – 2957 LUXEMBOURG

email : contact@police.public.lu

 

 

 

Luxembourg, August 14, 2019

Relates to: Confirmation of the locker bis

 

Mister Director,

I return to my previous letters.

Since I published your letter, some people have contacted me to express their astonishment that in the file given to them, there was no butterfly, and no major traffic violation, although they had exceeded the authorized speed and parked irregularly.

So I have to assume that you are making arbitrary choices by focusing on certain people, while omitting others, yet in the same situation.

From where new questions which I will transmit to the deputies and to whom it may concern.

I await a detailed answer.

Receive my feelings.

 

 

  1. Gaston VOGEL, emp.

(absent at signature)

 

 

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here