P
aris is in flames! That has been more than once the headline in our neighbors in recent weeks. The word goes on: if tires or pallets catch fire, this may sound spectacular, but it is rather harmless: protesters and police officers may have breathing problems, but are not in danger of life. The title: Paris stands in flames one must therefore see more broadly. It’s all France, which is in flames, not because of a few tires or cars, but it is the flame from the hearts of many Frenchmen, a fumbled rosary!
C’est la révolte? Non, Sire, the Revolution! France is very far from it, but there is not much more to catapult the country into complete chaos. The situation is sadly that unfortunately, something like the other side has said things – today via Facebook and Twitter – that do not necessarily correspond to the truth, and that are only meant to pour further oil into the fire.
Brigitte Macron, for example, is often violently attacked. If she were to manipulate her husband, and not to forget, she would have made the decision to exchange food service at the Elysée against a new animal and to renew her model. Of course, this has cost a fortune and can be debated, but now being responsible for a false policy of the last 30 years is exaggerated. And what does the public say about such slogans, à la “Brigitte, on vient te baiser” or even “Brigitte, on va te mettre nue sur une palette”? That must be a pretty witch then !! I regret that no single party from the right until the left spectrum was enraged over such statements. Of course, the woman can be criticized just like her husband, just like her husband, but here I do not suspect that the parties are just as happy that the movement is a march so in the labyrinths, and that therefore every means is allowed! And where do women’s organizations stay in that context? At least they had to be horrified! At this moment one prefers to return: just say nothing against the gilets!
“…a boxer who is out there fighting, as abandoned by all good spirits…”
Unfortunately, under the gilets, there are also cassiers underneath, so clues are also normal, sometimes they are from the right, sometimes from the left, mostly but political, but only that this is the case. That the social system is made responsible for a suppression from top to bottom, I can argue and it reminds me of my political youth (R.A.F. versus Helmut Schmidt); That system is also made responsible to the police, as a state force contributing to the oppression, I do not understand in the case of France! The country is a democratic republic and the police are only being used to protect the citizens. So when a professional boxer solidifies himself with the gilets jaunes and turns on a police officer, as if he was abandoned by all good spirits, then I’m horrified. I understand the reaction of the police who tweet: vous n’avez pas respecté les règles de la boxe, on vous apprendre les règles du code penal! Unfortunately, there are direct votes that indicate that, in the United States, the police would have fired at such a teller, although ‘a legitimate defense’. This should not happen in France, not only because it must not be the case in a democracy, but especially since the situation would become extremely explosive! 48 hours later, however, I am just as shocked by the blind men of police include, for example, a black one standing quietly facing a facade. Degoutant!
I do not assume that rowing among the French will lend itself quickly; and if, only then, to reopen later. Let’s see what will happen in Kirchberg tomorrow …
