The change liars are idiots! Basta!

0
21
Fridays for future, climate demonstrations, Greta Thunberg

chancellor Angela Merkel stands on the side of the theory of climate change. This is her good right! She wishes that more discussion was held between climate change believers and the – skeptics. However, this is often not that easy, because the first think they are right and the other side flies with their arguments; it would be better not to let them speak at all! Because of this, there is a great response from Mario Dichter on his blog https://nues-am-wand.lu/von-nuetzlichen-idioten-und-einer-neuen-weltordnung/ , a reaction I want to mention here:

Of useful idiots and a new world order

Wow! Who would have thought?

I am in a team with personalities such as that of a former RTL editor-in-chief, a well-known star lawyer in Germany, a CSV member and former parliament president, a former minister and EU parliamentarian and a current ADR member!

How do I get this unexpected honor?

Well, if you believe the article “Climate of Denial” written by Tom Mathes and published on his platform “Vérité en Détresse”, we are all deniers of the current “climate crisis”, attack and discredit “science” (whatever one under “the Science ”and create confusion through our articles and various posts by spreading disinformation about climate change.

At this point, I save myself from dealing with all the ad hominem attacks, circular reasoning arguments, distortions, wrong conclusions and citations, which everyone is happy to read and check for themselves and prefer to get to the core of such exemplary articles and their consequences. Without wanting to accuse the author of bad intentions here, such an article, perhaps even a well-intentioned article (the opposite of ‘well-intentioned’ is known to be ‘well-made’) involuntarily contributes to the age-old strategy of “Divide et Impera”, that is, “parts and Conquer “.

With the principle of “divide and conquer”, which is clearly and clearly recognizable in the current so-called climate discussion, there is logically and consequently always an initiator who pursues his interests, i.e. a beneficiary. Due to a dogma installed by him, he knows to divide a previously united group of people into two mutually opposing camps, such as Classically in left and right, in good and bad, gladly also in believers and non-believers, or just, as in our case, in climate change and climate skeptics. While both camps are now working on minor matters and figuratively or actually because of this, the beneficiary can use the energy and (often involuntary) help of useful idiots (useful idiots, sorry, not from me, but from me) Term originating from secret service circles) consolidate his dogma and literally have it chiseled in stone, like here that of anthropogenic climate change.

In principle, useful idiots are firmly convinced that they belong to the “good”, not least because they do not question, let alone check, this dogma, like a religion, but simply believe it, or, what is even more reprehensible, in some way for their help is favored or even paid for, or at least hoped to do so. Knowing that they belong to a majority (everyone says … 97% of scientists say that …) they weigh themselves in safety and, because of the steadily increasing loss of all rationality, they continue to delve into a veritable delusion, in this case the climate delusion.

But who is this beneficiary here? First of all, we know who it is definitely not, namely the climate, because there is no such thing as “climate” and certainly not a “world climate”, only different climate zones. You cannot protect or even “save” the climate, because in principle it is only a mathematical value that can be calculated from temperature, precipitation, wind, etc., i.e. weather and time. Neither weather nor time can be protected or saved, however, and “saving the climate” therefore appears to be nothing more than an excuse to impose unpleasant laws, changes, financial burdens, etc. on people, which, without this dogma, can even be done without a reason would not be enforceable.

Anyone who is still able to add up 1 and 1 in the “climate debate” (sic!) And who has not already fallen into CO2 lethargy through the climate change mantra will find that actors from politics, the media and “science” including their greta To a large extent followers also belong to said useful idiots and the beneficiaries must therefore be completely different. One reads and hears now and then between the lines, then slowly and more and more clearly reveals the real reason for the current, artificially generated climate hysteria, namely the installation of a completely new, let’s call it, ‘world order’, based on a kind Green bio-communism including planned economy, paternalism, circumcision of individual freedoms and total surveillance, all ideally, since we are dealing with CO2 emissions, after all, with a global “problem” under the care of a totalitarian world government.

George Orwell sends greetings when a UN subsidiary organization such as the IPCC or the WHO suddenly appears like the Ministry of Truth, media like a flag in the wind only act as a propaganda speech tube that is already cleverly replacing the omnipresent surveillance tele-screen with smartphones, smart meters, GPS and credit cards was and “the community of states” acts as an overarching thought police, by which everyone gets to feel the Nazi club, who does not submissively approve of even the most nonsense of “big brother”!

Anyone who is still able to add up 1 and 1 in the “climate debate” (sic!) And who has not already fallen into CO2 lethargy through the climate change mantra will find that actors from politics, the media and “science” including their greta To a large extent followers also belong to said useful idiots and the beneficiaries must therefore be completely different. One reads and hears now and then between the lines, then slowly and more and more clearly reveals the real reason for the current, artificially generated climate hysteria, namely the installation of a completely new, let’s call it, ‘world order’, based on a kind Green bio-communism including planned economy, paternalism, circumcision of individual freedoms and total surveillance, all ideally, since we are dealing with CO2 emissions, after all, with a global “problem” under the care of a totalitarian world government.

George Orwell sends greetings when a UN subsidiary organization such as the IPCC or the WHO suddenly appears like the Ministry of Truth, media like a flag in the wind only act as a propaganda speech tube that is already cleverly replacing the omnipresent surveillance tele-screen with smartphones, smart meters, GPS and credit cards was and “the community of states” acts as an overarching thought police, by which everyone gets to feel the Nazi club, who does not submissively approve of even the most nonsense of “big brother”!

We are well on our way to an eco-do-it-yourself ban dictatorship and we should be extremely careful that one day, with the help of said good-faith useful idiots, we are stupid, brainwashed, vaccinated and chipped by AI terminators Flocks of sheep end up in fully insulated and permanently irradiated silos that still believe the empty promises of their own butchers!

Mario Dichter

01/28/2020

In a letter to rtl.lu, Mr Merzig actually wrote almost everything concerning the views of climate skeptics:

We humans should belong to the kind of “homo sapiens”, the “wise man”.

When I think about the discussions about climate change, I seriously doubt that we humans should really be wise. Nobody can object if efforts are made to be more conscious of our environment. We only have our one wonderful earth and so far we have been negligent with it. There is no doubt about this. But the climate hysteria that has been breaking out for some time does not show much wisdom either. For me personally, the word “climate change” has become the word of the year. Since eternal times, the climate, neither on earth nor in space, has not been constant and will never become one. Our universe, including our solar system and therefore also our earth, are subject to constant change, whether with or without people!

Anyone who wants to deal with the climate changes on our earth will not come across disciplines such as physical chemistry, statistical physics, IR spectroscopy, astrophysics, etc. past. If you do this, however, you will quickly find that it is too easy to simply attribute the climate changes to CO2 and thus explain the problem. It is not wise to believe unconditionally in everything that the IPCC, the green movement and politicians tell us. We used to be threatened with purgatory and hell and now the end of the world is predicted. Nice bizarre prospects! Helmut Schmidt once remarked: “You don’t always have to tell people everything, but if you tell them something, you can’t lie to them!” Today’s politicians should take an example from this wise statesman.

I absolutely agree that the above-mentioned disciplines are not the easiest, and that the knowledge of the various specialist areas does not just fit into one head. But it is like A. Einstein once said: “You must not understand Physics, but it helps”. The prolonged study of these disciplines is a real revelation and you judge some things very differently. Above all, one realizes very quickly that we politicians who call themselves to explain everything to us are literally sold for stupid citizens.

That the winter and summer storms on Earth, both their intensity and their direction, are correlated with the sun’s activity (sunspot cycle), that there are correlations between the sunspot cycles and cosmic radiation, that ionization phenomena in the high atmospheric layers, triggered by the Cosmic radiation, aerosol formation and thereby cloud formation have a very strong influence on the fact that volcanism, especially submarine volcanism has increased, is hardly known. Very little is also known that the sun’s radiation has increased by about 30% to date and will continue to increase. The slope of the earth’s axis, the gyroscopic movement of the earth and the eccentricity of the earth’s orbit around the sun are also not constants. They change in more or less regular and larger periods and affect our climate. All of these factors are minimized by the IPCC and are ignored at all.

But precisely because the whole matter is so difficult and has not yet been fully researched scientifically, so-called climate change was linked to a single factor for practical reasons, namely CO2. And this for the goodwill of politicians, lobbyists, clairvoyants and environmental activists. For an accountant-grade politician, it is easy to calculate how much CO2 is produced when burning hydrocarbon compounds. A CO2 tax and CO2 certificates can be constructed very easily from these calculations. The lobbyists are rubbing their hands together, because the “green industry”, with the financial world and their “Green Climat Fund” behind them, can help the economy make big profits and everything continues to run smoothly. The Leyens “Green Deal” is similar. You have to seriously ask yourself the justified question whether such measures, which cost a lot of money and have to be financed by the taxpayer, can really make progress and whether you can achieve anything at all.

With the introduction of the CO2 tax, the citizens will once again become paying Saxony! Most people need the car in everyday life because our society was organized around the car. Citizens now have to bleed once again for past mistakes made by decision-makers. This is not a wise policy and can be described as insolent.

That the CO2 Pope and IPCC member Dr. Michael Mann (known for the so-called golf club diagram) was convicted last year by the Supreme Court (civil court) in British Colombia (Canada) for not disclosing allegedly manipulated data and documents that the so-called “Climagate” scandal by hacking the email traffic between The so-called IPCC scientists have been shown that there were votes to achieve the desired results using trimmed computer models and faked data. This is not talked about or written about in public. The media unfortunately remain silent in this regard. Dr. Mann preferred to pay a few million dollars to the court rather than disclose his information. By the way, Dr. There will soon be a criminal trial on the same matter. Hopefully the whole truth will come to light.

Well understood, there are also members who know the truth in the world climate. These could be found in the so-called “Basic Documents” of the IPCC, which were never published and are never published without compulsion. Instead, the public is flooded with tuned ad hoc documents, information, television programs and bad news that are far from today’s scientific knowledge. Independent and inconvenient scientists are hushed up and their findings are not even taken into account. It’s not like that in the scientific world. Disclosure of data and theories is paramount. So the approach of the IPCC and its associates can confidently be described as unscientific.

Sustainability is an iterative process that takes time. From an environmental point of view, a steam locomotive from earlier days no longer has much in common with an electric locomotive from today. Every new car is better than the old one. The better is the good death! Let us leave the church in the village and give ourselves the time necessary to make the right and wise decisions with the right knowledge. Fear and hysteria were still bad advice. I am convinced that humanity will be able to live in more environmentally friendly conditions in the future. This is evolution too! You just have to believe in human capabilities and put the mercantile spirit of our society in the background.

Y-J Mertzig

maître Vogel has already mentioned in his articles the names of unspecified specialists and this list could be extended day by day. I do this briefly today with Patrick de Wever, a French geologist https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_De_Wever who writes in his book “Le beau livre de la terre”: The sedimentary rocks keep in memory the traces of past environments and bear witness to the great phases of climate variation. The functioning of the planet is fundamentally influenced by the sun …. the earth turns on itself on an inclined axis, the angle of which varies cyclically …. The existence of these cycles, called ‘Milankovic ‘, can also be read in ice cores and marine sediments.

image credits: Welt der Physik

It is assumed that this specialist will also be trampled on, arguing – as has often been the case – that with 71 years he was “dépassé par les évènements”, thus, a dear gran’father who would have better continue knocking his stones and not to write expensive books.

i t has ben proven that our planet had one last ice age 18,000 years ago. Since then, temperatures have climbed, glaciers disappear. A debt to that revival was not CO2, at least not alone:​​ https: //www.weltderphysik.de/gebiet/erde/news/2007/das-ende-der-letzten-eiszeit/

In between, there were brief periods where it got colder or warmer. The term “small ice age” should not be used, rather “cold time”, the last in Europe around 1500 to 1850 AD  fa To make sure that we woun’t imitate the English and the Scandinavians, who died of hunger for hundreds of thousands, it would be important if agriculture were to meet that challenge already.

We must also learn to cope with the new seasons: there will be longer periods where it is warm, and if it rains, new techniques must be found to replenish the underground water reserves. Those are the real challenges! Nobody is denying to deal more wisely with the planet ….

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here