Mario Dichter is not only a climate skeptic, but he is against vaccination duty. I hesitated long before I posted his text below. After all, I am convinced by the vaccines, especially since in my childhood I had one or the other classmate, with childhood paralysis. That didn’t look pretty! Later, as an adult, I saw the other side of the medal, namely a child who hadn’t had the vaccine at all! This is just the risk that one is facing: most things are going well and many childhood diseases have disappeared in our latitudes so completely! But Mario Dichter’s head is mainly about the witch hunt done against people who don’t want to vaccinate their children …
also Germany will then, like France and Italy, introduce a compulsory vaccination, in this case against measles, in spite of numerous protests that have received little attention in the media. In this way, the state effectively deprives parents of their child’s health care and responsibility after the educational (due to exploding rents and real estate prices, kindergarten and day care) and educational (compulsory schooling). From 2020 onwards, all parents in Germany will have to bow to the compulsory medication of their children, otherwise they will face a severe fine (by the way, the word ‘fine’ comes from Old High German and appropriately means ‘healing by magic’). Needless to say that such a procedure, especially in Germany, is reminiscent of the darkest times!
Whether critical or in favor of vaccination … all responsible parents agree on one thing; They only want the best for their children, albeit based on completely different worldviews. Some unconditionally trust the promise of salvation of a profit-oriented industry, which is their right, the others, based on the facts, have decided not to have their children vaccinated, which is their right, or at least should be. However, compulsory vaccination is the exact opposite of the often cited Western values such as “freedom of choice” or “democracy” and is therefore part of a wide range of imposed measures by government and political actors, which have been and will continue to be taken in recent years, e.g. the so-called “climate package” or the almost forgotten migration pact.
The principle of vaccination for its part sounds as simple as it is ingenious. Suspected pathogens are deliberately supplied to the body, which reacts with minimal, mostly non-specific symptoms of the disease, e.g. Fever, which is then supposed to “learn” the (scientifically unproven) immune system to deal with the suspected contact with potential pathogens more quickly in the foreseeable future in order to protect the organism from a specific disease. For this reason it is often spoken of vaccinations and, from a certain vaccination rate, even of a (claimed, scientifically but also never proven) “herd” immunity, which shows what the authorities obviously consider the common foot people.
In the late 1990s, a so-called case-control study with reference to MMR vaccination (measles-mumps-rubella), which the British gastroenterologist Andrew Wakefield and his team had carried out on 12 children and later, became popular was published in the peer review journal “The Lancet”. This study showed the likely association between autistic disorders and chronic bowel problems in all 12 children examined, but not, as is often incorrectly claimed, the association between autism and MMR vaccination (1). In 8 of the 12 children, however, the parents actually reported that the symptoms appeared shortly after said vaccination, whereupon Dr. Wakefield advised that this triple vaccination be replaced by single vaccines for the time being and, as always in cases such that further research would be needed.
But this met with harsh criticism from experts, Dr. Wakefield lost his job and license after various defamation campaigns, and the study published in “Lancet” was even completely withdrawn in 2010. This rather unusual approach was preceded by pressure from the British Medical Association, as well as the “uncovering” in the form of unproven claims by investigative Sunday-Times journalist Brian Deer. To date, Wakefield has not been able to invalidate these in court due to a lack of financial resources, in contrast to Dr. John Walker-Smith, one of his co-authors, who was rehabilitated by the highest court in 2012, effectively eliminating doubts about the accuracy of the study.
Dr. Wakefield went on the offensive in 2016 with the film “VAXXED” (2), using documents from a whistleblower to show the machinations of the American “health” agency CDC regarding vaccines and to let parents have their say that there is a clear connection between them Can produce autism and vaccinations. Incidentally, the autism rate in the USA was 1: 10000 in the 1970s, in 2018 it was 1:59 (3), and the trend is still rising! During the same period, the recommended vaccinations for children up to the age of 15 months rose continuously from 2 to now 27. Chance or just better diagnostics? The CDC stubbornly refuses to scientifically investigate this obvious correlation!
Germany is now making this Russian roulette game a must and it is feared that it will only be a matter of time
To conclude Brian Deer, he is subordinate to the Times journalist Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation empire, whose son James was director of the pharmaceutical giant Glaxo-Smith-Kline from 2009-2012, the manufacturer of the said MMR vaccine. His term of office falls exactly in the period in which the Wakefield study in the “Lancet” was withdrawn!
A prankster who thinks bad …
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2897%2911096-0
http://www.vaxxed-derfilm.de/
Mario Dichter, December 16, 2019
Mister Dichter has a blog: https: //nues-am-wand.lu/impfpflicht-und-die-kriminalisierung-unbescholtener-menschen/
